Layout:
Home > Retirement goal progress

Retirement goal progress

May 2nd, 2016 at 04:53 am

I revised our retirement goal because I got a small raise but AS made slightly less in 2015 than projected. The old goal: $486,000 in retirement assets by 2019.

The new one: $485,480 by 2019
(As a reminder, this is to get me to 3x my current salary which is now $66,625, so $199,875; NT to 3x his, which is now $57,083, so $171,249; and AS to 2x hers, which last year totaled $57,178, so $114,356)

Current balance: $265,900

March 2016 balance: $263,174

Progress: $2,726

To reach the goal by our birthdays in 2019, that's 34 months, so we'd need $6458 per month to reach it. Looking less and less likely we'll reach it, but I've got to keep trying!

16 Responses to “Retirement goal progress”

  1. PatientSaver Says:
    1462187168

    You're doing great!

    I guess I'm curious why 3x your current salary is your retirement number. Is there a particular retirement calculator that recommended that? Seems like every time I do one of those, i come up with a somewhat different number, so I am always interested in how others arrive at their retirement goals.

  2. ceejay74 Says:
    1462201423

    I am glad to share, and happy for any constructive input as well, because I'm not really sure if this is what I should be doing! I started with the 8x current income at retirement rule of thumb and worked backward. Since I have no idea what our income will be at retirement, I use our current incomes and shift the goal if our incomes shift. That way I'm thinking the goal will get gradually more ambitious but not take any huge leaps.

    I'm 42 and NT is 43, but for simplicity I'm tracking us both by my age. AS is 37 so I'm tracking her goal differently. Here's how I broke down the rule of thumb:

    1x by 35
    2x by 40
    3x by 45
    4x by 50
    5x by 55
    6x by 59
    7x by 63
    8x by 67

    Since AS will be 40 and I'll be 45 in 2019, our goal is to hit 2x her income and 3x my and NT's income by our birthdays that year. (Almost certainly unreachable, but it's something to shoot for.)

  3. ceejay74 Says:
    1462201825

    I'm glad you asked, because I realize my math was off! Not sure how I reached that total last night, but I was very tired so I probably just got mixed up. Although I got a raise, AS made less than the $60K estimate I based her part of the goal on, so our goal is actually ever so slightly less ambitious than before. Of course, NT will probably get a raise this year, and AS may make more this year than last, so it might change again.

  4. Dido Says:
    1462207744

    So, in answer to P.S.'s question, it's not 3x salary as a final retirement number, but 3x by age 45.

    8x might be a little low as a retirement number--see yourmoneyratios.com, which I believe recommends 10-12x income as a rough rule of thumb. You can get access to the bronze level (retire at 70 w/70% income replacement) calculator for free. His silver level is retire at 65 w/70% and gold is retire at 65 w/80% income replacement--and one of those two has a 12x income retirement number. I'll try to remember to look it up in the book at home--definitely a book I'd recommend.

    Also on the topic--those rough rules of thumb are fine when you're at your stage (more than a decade out from retirement), but a recent study I read in the professional literature of how good those online retirement calculators are shows little agreement between websites and little agreement with the numbers proposed by professional level software--in large part because of the built-in assumptions, which are probably not accurate for YOUR situation. As someone who's recently started as a professional in the business, when introduced to our firm's software, I was told "the most important input is what you put on the assumptions page"--even more important than balances and allocations!

    As you close in on five years of retirement is when professional advice can be especially valuable. There is a lot that a planner can help you do especially in the five years before and after you retire to help you reduce total taxes and properly allocate your money between taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts and plan for the appropriate sequencing of withdrawals from your different accounts.

  5. ceejay74 Says:
    1462215417

    Thank you Dido. I misread and didn't realize she thought 3x was our total retirement goal. I did a detailed assumptions setup with my work 401(k) software and they project that I'll have a surplus on retirement. On the other hand, I seem to be badly behind on the 8x track. So it's all kind of confusing. I don't want to get comfortable with my 401(k) co's prediction because I don't feel like I've been saving anywhere near enough for anywhere near long enough. If I were to believe it, I wouldn't have to change anything, and I just don't think that's true. I should redo the assumptions page and see if I lowballed something that I shouldn't have.

  6. ceejay74 Says:
    1462217931

    OK, I redid my assumptions and came out with a $147 per month gap at retirement. Which is basically the cost of a latte in 25 years, right? Wink
    But seriously, I'm still not sure I'm doing it right. I had a 7% rate of return and changed it to 6%. Is that still too optimistic? I'm fairly aggressive in my investing strategy.

    Utilities, groceries and transportation were pretty easy because I just plugged in today's numbers (the calculator adjusts for inflation for me). Housing, healthcare, insurance and taxes I wasn't so sure about (I threw in $500, $500, $250 and $1500). But I also put a giant chunk in entertainment/discretionary/other ($3800), which I figure could be used for the other expenses instead of fun stuff.

    I included my spouses' retirement accounts and percent of savings in the "other savings" section, so I've accounted for that. I can't remember how I came to my Social Security estimate; not sure if I looked up all three of our SS accounts or just looked at mine and then hazarded a guess. It's at $3715 a month for all three of us.

    I suppose this is what you mean by rough rules of thumb being good enough at this age. I don't know how Social Security, healthcare, taxes etc. are going to look for me, but I will probably have a much better idea when I'm near retirement.

  7. Dido Says:
    1462230088

    Cost of a $4 latte in 25 years should be about $8.38 (rule of 72: divide 72 by average inflation rate of 3%, leads to 24 years for the price to double--very handy rule of thumb to know).

    As for return expectations, 6% is what Jack Bogle (founder of Vanguard & the whole idea of index funds) currently expects for stocks over the next decade; his expectation is 3% for bonds. So overall 6% might be a tad optimistic, depending on your asset allocation.

    And, by the way, you may be more likely to reach your 2019 goal than you think--your calculation at the beginning of the entry assumed that ALL of the increase in your retirement funds would come JUST from the contributions. But of course, you have dividends, interest, and capital gain distributions that are being reinvested into those funds. Using a 5% overall return, that would require $4,917 per month contribution at 5% APR gain, $5,224 per month at 4% APR gain, and $5,531 per month at 3% APR gain. In such a short time frame, gains are hard to predict (and it will undoubtedly be years with much bigger gains and at least one loss year in there), so I'd go with a more conservative number, but I'd still expect SOME of that increase in the value of your investments to come from the money that's already in there generating money, and not just from your salary deferrals! Just keep working on increasing those retirement plan contributions (the current "rule of thumb" on that is now generally given as 15%).

  8. PatientSaver Says:
    1462232853

    Your very last sentence, so true...but of course then there's very little time to make adjustments.

    I've used several different calculators multiple times, and they mostly seem to say I need a million dollars or $1,250,000 if you factor in the the $250K they say you'll need to cover healthcare expenses. I'm not a big spender but would like to be comfortable, so somewhere around $40K a year seems about right.

  9. ceejay74 Says:
    1462236108

    Thank you, Dido! That's all very helpful. It's hard to believe my investments will increase since I only started seriously tracking them a little over a year ago, right before when things started tanking. It took me until March to get back to my July high, and that's counting what I've contributed since July, so it just feels like my funds are gaining nothing or just slowly losing value. I know one year isn't an accurate measure of what it will be like from now on, though.

    Oh, and I was joking about the latte. Wink

    PatientSaver, do you adjust each year for inflation off that $40K number when obtaining your number? If we did end our career with these salaries, 8x would be $1,447,088, though I doubt we'll stay at our current salaries. (Nor do I think any of us will experience any sudden increases in income, though I have a lead on a possibly high-paying job that I might apply for just to see.) That's not much more than you're planning to save, and considering that you're retiring soon and I have another 25 years of work, it does seem a bit low.

    But, I'll just do what I can right now to keep improving on what we're putting a way. We've got a ways to go on that.

  10. Dido Says:
    1462244781

    I'm not sure if/how P.S. is accounting for inflation of her 40k draw, but my calculations show that a million (her base amount less the 250k medical fund) should keep her going for 36 years given 5% growth and 3% inflation. Which are important qualifiers but also reasonable assumptions.

  11. ceejay74 Says:
    1462245623

    That's a nifty trick, Dido! Do you use an online calculator, your own software, or do you just know how to calculate it on your own?

  12. PatientSaver Says:
    1462275753

    No, i'm not accounting for inflation when i say I'm shooting for a million. At this point, I think it highly unlikely i will get to $1,250,000 and i'll consider myself doing pretty well if i just hit $1 million.

    A lot of people wouldn't mind terribly working past 60, but punching the 9 to 5 clock has never been my thing

    The big challenge in my mind is finding a part-time job in retirement that pays more than $10 an hour and is actually enjoyable/tolerable. It would also need to be local. Having a p/t job would i think add some structure to my otherwise broadly unstructured time but more importantly, i'd like to ideally cover all my everyday expenses with that p/t job. Considering that i will stop contributing vast sums of money into my 401k/retirement, it might be possible to at least cut in half my living expenses which i know from previous expense are in the $2,000 a month range.

    So even if i just made $15/hr, I'd gross $1200 a month and maybe net $900, just about half of my expected monthly expenses.

  13. Dido Says:
    1462281347

    Ceejay, I know how to calculate the "present value of a growing annuity" (and I know that that's the proper value to be calculating!) My electives when I was taking accounting classes were in finance, and I find doing the calculations fun--one reason I changed fields. You can probably find a calculator online BUT the possible problem with that (just like the problem with doing taxes) is that you need to know what the inputs are and what reasonable outputs are, since calculators are dumb--"garbage in, garbage out." Just following computer prompts doesn't ensure that you will get the right answer. :^)

    And P.S., you really should be fine with getting close to a million. Don't forget you will get Social Security too--no matter what changes they make to the system, there will be something, and the legislation, whatever it proves to be, is more likely to hit people who have more time to prepare for what they need to save harder. We've already been hit hard on our SS by the increase in retirement age and the recent elimination of the various SS strategies (which mostly affected married people, but there was one little provision that went away that was a nice little insurance buffer for singles).

  14. ceejay74 Says:
    1462287310

    Thanks for telling me the term! Maybe I'll do some research and learn how to calculate it myself. It's funny, I hated math in school but I do love working with numbers from a personal finance point of view.

  15. LivingAlmostLarge Says:
    1462289838

    Good luck! Did you ever tell people how you all three meet?

  16. ceejay74 Says:
    1462330133

    I don't know that I have ... I suppose I could do a post about that since I'm sure it raises questions!

Leave a Reply

(Note: If you were logged in, we could automatically fill in these fields for you.)
*
Will not be published.
   

* Please spell out the number 4.  [ Why? ]

vB Code: You can use these tags: [b] [i] [u] [url] [email]